Scroll to top
Tag: Trust
02/28/2022

Digital Therapeutics Should Be Regulated With Gold-Standard Evidence

Article Excerpt: There is enormous growth in the digital health sector, illustrated by huge capital investment, and a massive proliferation of mental and behavioral health apps and associated marketing claims. We are particularly concerned about one component of this sector, namely “software as a medical device”, which the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) defines as “software intended to be used for one or more medical purposes,….without being part of a hardware medical device,” and where the purpose is “treatment or alleviation of disease.” This new approach to treatment, increasingly referred to as digital therapeutics (DTx), has the potential to transform mental health care. The global DTx market was valued at more than $3.5 billion in 2020 and is projected to reach $23.5 billion by 2030. According to industry reporting, the largest number of DTx programs today are related to mental health, and most FDA submissions for DTx use cognitive behavioral therapy to promote behavior change in conditions ranging from insomnia to substance use disorder. The opportunity for innovation is clear. However, there are challenges that must be addressed.

Full Article: https://tinyurl.com/2myajfns

Article Source: Health Affairs

04/04/2021

Should You Read the Notes Your Doctor Writes About You?

Article Excerpt: Today, we do have the technology to capture the most critical and patient-centric pieces of a discussion (such as the critical details of a cancer diagnosis) and preserve these for the patient and family. This technology might be as simple as a voice memo on a smartphone, but it could soon be smarter and more automated than that. Next time we will explore this frontier, in the form of “Open Recordings,” with innovator and researcher Dr. Paul Barr.

Full Article: https://tinyurl.com/srmta22a

Article Source: Psychology Today

09/18/2020

The mobile health app trustworthiness checklist: Usability assessment

van Haasteren A, Vayena E, Powell J. (2020). The mobile health app trustworthiness checklist: Usability assessment. JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth. 8(7): e16844. doi: 10.2196/16844

Researchers recruited 49 stakeholders to assess the feasibility of a user-generated mobile health app trustworthiness (mHAT) checklist. Read More

09/11/2020

Development of the mHealth App Trustworthiness checklist

van Haasteren A, Gille F, Fadda M, Vayena E. (2019). Development of the mHealth App Trustworthiness checklist. Digital Health. 5: 1-21. doi: 10.1177/2055207619886463

Researchers developed a 41-item mobile app trustworthiness (mHAT) checklist to inform app development. The mHAT checklist addresses the features and characteristics of mHealth apps associated with perceived trustworthiness. Read More

10/18/2019

Can your phone be your therapist? Young people’s ethical perspectives on the use of fully automated conversational agents (chatbots) in mental health support

Kretzschmar K, Tyroll H, Pavarini G, Manzini A, Singh I. (2019). Can your phone be your therapist? Young people’s ethical perspectives on the use of fully automated conversational agents (chatbots) in mental health support. Biomedical Informatics Insights. 11: 1–9. doi: 10.1177/1178222619829083

Twenty-four members and 3 co-leaders of an English health ethics student advisory group (aged 14-18) participated in group discussions of adolescent perspectives on computerized conversational agents (chatbots) in mental health interventions at a 4-day digital health conference in London. Read More

10/11/2019

Why reviewing apps is not enough: Transparency for Trust (T4T) principles of responsible health app marketplaces

Wykes T, Schueller S. (2019). Why reviewing apps is not enough: Transparency for Trust (T4T) principles of responsible health app marketplaces. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 21(5): e12390. doi: 10.2196/12390

Researchers developed a set of Transparency for Trust (T4T) principles to guide presentation of efficacy and privacy practices and inform consumer choice in commercial health applications (apps). Predicated on experimental study, systematic review, and patient-concern data, the 4 principles include Privacy and Data Security, Development Characteristics, Feasibility Data, and Benefits. Read More