Duff J, Meloncelli N, Purtell L, et al. Evaluating the HELIX4 implementation capacity-building program. JBI Evid Implement. 2025;doi:10.1097/XEB.0000000000000509
This study evaluated the HELIX4 implementation capacity-building program (HELIX4 program) in two metropolitan health services in Queensland, Australia. The HELIX4 program is a 12-month initiative designed by implementation science experts to support the implementation of evidence-based practices among interdisciplinary healthcare teams. Recruitment involved two phases: individuals or teams first applied to participate in a two-day workshop (n=23), which focused on developing practical knowledge and skills in implementation science. After the workshop, teams submitted expressions of interest and pitched their projects to an expert panel, describing their evidence–practice gap and organizational support. Based on project merit, alignment with organization priorities, and feasibility, seven teams were selected to receive additional support and coaching for implementing evidence-based changes. The selected teams participated in the second phase of training, which involved conducting implementation projects within their departments, supplemented by monthly 1-hour virtual mentorship and coaching sessions. Participants expressed high satisfaction with the HELIX4 program, particularly the mentorship and expert panel support. All participants in the second workshop (n=7) reported satisfaction with the program, and 86% valued the support from facilitators (mean=4.6). The integration of workshops and mentorship was crucial for the teams that advanced their implementation projects. Improvements in knowledge and confidence were observed across both training phases. The HELIX4 program improved participants’ application of knowledge (p<0.001), and there was also increased use of evidence-based implementation practices and greater leadership recognition of implementation. While early successes were achieved, challenges related to long-term sustainability and time management remain. Future programs should address these barriers, expand the model to diverse healthcare settings, and examine the long-term impact on patient care.